Condominium Associations

Do you need to have a “physical place” for your association meetings?

During the early Covid times many Associations moved their board and members meetings to Zoom or to Telephone Conference under emergency powers granted by the Governor and the Legislature to Condominium and Homeowners Associations.

For Condominium Associations, Section 718.1265(1)(a), Florida Statues and for Homeowner’s Associations, Section 720.316(1)(a), Florida Statutes state that if a State of Emergency has been called in the area encompassed by the association, the board of directors may “Conduct board meetings, committee meetings, elections, or membership meeting, in whole or in part by telephone, real-time videoconferencing, or similar real-time electronic or video communication . . .” (emphasis added)

During the Covid State of Emergency, many Florida Condominium and Homeowners’ Associations got used to having their meetings purely on Zoom or Teleconference with no physical location stated our used for the meetings.

A lot of Associations liked these totally electronic meetings, especially in the off Season when many owners were out of town, and want to continue to do have them this way.

Now that the Covid State of Emergency rules and regulations have been lifted, we recommend that in addition to notice of the Zoom meeting sign-in or Teleconference call in number, a physical location of all Association meetings should also be stated and used to conform with the spirit of the law and to accommodate those who may not be computer savvy or have a handicap.

Section 617.0820(1), Florida Statutes provides that “the board of directors may hold regular or special meetings in or out of this state” wherever the board finds it prudent.  The place may include the offices of the association’s attorney, accountant, manage or other location deemed appropriate by the board.

It does not appear that a Zoom meeting or Teleconference meeting is being held at any “place”.  Place is described in the dictionary as “a physical environment”.  Physical is defined as “having material existence.” So, an “electronic environment” of Zoom or Teleconference does not appear to be the same as a physical environment or place.

Once you have named a physical location for a meeting, Section 617.0820(4), Florida Statutes provides that unless prohibited by the articles of incorporation or bylaws, the board of directors may permit any or all directors to participate in a meeting by means of telecommunication, such as by conference call so long as all directors may simultaneously hear each other during the meeting. Those participating in a board meeting in this manner is considered to be present at the meeting.”

Now the physical location of the meeting does not need to be onsite or even in the County or Country where the property is located.  However, it probably should be near the community to accommodate in house owners.

For the annual meeting of members in Condominiums, Section 718.11292)(d)1., Florida Statutes provides that: “Annual meeting of the unit owners must be held at a location provided for in the association bylaws and, if the bylaws are silent as to the location, the meeting must be held within 45 miles of the condominium property.”

Although it is fine to still have your Zoom or Teleconference Association meetings, remember to also designate a physical place for the meeting such as the board room, social room, pool house, club house, or manager’s office for most meetings of the members and the board.

Condos and HOA's

Your assigned condo parking space may be more valuable if it is transferable

In the vast majority of Residential Condominium in Southwest Florida, the Developers have assigned certain parking spaces to certain units as limited common elements appurtenant to those units.

Chapter 718, Florida Statutes defines limited common elements as: “those common elements which are reserved for the use of a certain unit or units to the exclusion of all other units, as specified in the declaration.”

Typically the original declaration of condominium locks a developer assigned limited element common parking space to the unit it has been assigned in perpetuity and the space therefore cannot be assigned, transferred, swapped or sold to another unit owner.

This can be an issue for some owners as some may want to get a parking space closer and more convenient to their unit or one that is better designed or located to parking their unusual sized or handicap equipped vehicle. Sometimes an owner will acquire two (2) units and want to swap the units assigned spaces and then sell one (1) of the units along with the exclusive right to use the other unit’s original assigned space.

The inability to reassign such parking spaces left by the developer can be overcome if the declaration is amended by a vote of the owners to allow for such.

Section 718.106(2)(b), Florida Statutes now provides that:  “There shall pass with a unit, as appurtenances thereto: . . . (b) The exclusive right to use such portion of the common elements as may be provided by the declaration, including the right to transfer such right to other units or unit owners to the extent authorized by the declaration as originally recorded, or amendments to the declaration adopted pursuant to the provisions contained therein. Amendments to declarations of condominium providing for the transfer of use rights with respect to limited common elements are not amendments that materially modify unit appurtenances as described in s. 718.110(4).  However, in order to be effective, the transfer of use rights with respect to limited common elements must be effectuated in conformity with the procedures set forth in the declaration as originally recorded or as amended under the procedures provided therein.”

So if you want to allow your owners to buy, sell or trade their assigned parking spaces with other unit owners, you can go for a vote of the owners to amend your declaration to permit such transfers.  Many times we will add such transfer ability language when we do a total rewrite and update of an Association’s governing documents if that is the consensus desire of the Condominium’s owners.

What if the owners of a condominium believe they were assigned limited common element parking spaces but their declaration of condominium does not reference any such assignments?

Section 718.110(14), Florida Statutes provides that:  “Except for those portions of the common elements designed and intended to be used by all unit owners, a portion of the common elements serving only one or a group of units may be reclassified as a limited common element upon the vote required to amend the declaration as provided therein or as required under paragraph (1)(a), and shall not be considered an amendment pursuant to subsection (4).”

So, such an amendment would work to codify owners’ assigned parking spaces or to limit other areas of the property to certain owners such as particular stairways,  elevators, landings, storage lockers or floor specific amenities) only as intended by the developer or the property layout but never specified in the original declaration.

Florida Legislature

Florida Senate Bill 4-D Part II

Last month we looked at the requirements for Mandatory Milestone Structural Inspections for condominium and cooperative buildings that are three (3) stories or more in height before 12/31/24 under Florida Senate Bill 4-D approved in a special session of the Florida Legislature this year in response to the Surfside hi-rise collapse in Miami last year.

Today, we will look at three other major requirements of Senate Bill 4-D.  Requirements for Structural Integrity Reserve Studies, removal of membership’s ability to waiver reserves and the Division of Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes’ jurisdiction to hear complaints about these building inspections and reserve studies.

For condominium and cooperative buildings three (3) stories or more high, for associations existing on or before July 1, 2022 and before a developer can turnover an association to its members, a Structural Integrity Reserve Study must be completed before December 31, 2024.

The Structural Integrity Reserve Study shall include a study, at a minimum, of the roof, load-bearing walls, floor, foundation, fire protection systems, plumbing, electrical systems, waterproofing, exterior painting, windows and any other items that have a deferred maintenance expense or replacement cost exceed $10,000.

The Study must be performed by a qualified person and the visual inspection portion must be performed by a licensed architect or engineer.  The Study must identify common areas inspected, the estimated remaining useful life, and the estimated replacement cost or deferred maintenance expense of the area inspected, and provide a recommended annual reserve amount that achieves the estimated replacement cost or deferred maintenance expense by the end of the estimated useful life of the area inspected.

If an association fails to complete a Structural Integrity, as required, such failure will be considered a breach of an officers’ or directors’ fiduciary duty to unit owners.

Effective 12/31/24, the members of a unit owner controlled association may not determine to provide no reserves or less reserves than required by the Structural Integrity Reserve Study.

In addition, an association may not vote to use reserve funds identified in the Structural Integrity Reserve Study, or any interest accruing thereon, for any other purposes other than for the reserves’ intended purposes as identified in the Study.

On or before 1/1/23, a condominium or cooperative must provide the Division of Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes (Division), on a form provided for on the Division’s website, the number of buildings on the property that are three (3) stories or higher, the total number of units in all such buildings, the addresses of all such buildings and the counties in which such buildings are located. The Division has jurisdiction to receive complaints related to the Mandatory Milestone Structural Inspections and the Structural Integrity Reserve Studies.

Many believe these new laws of Bill 4-D will be heavily tweaked in the 2023 regular legislative session to lessen the heavy burdens these laws place on Florida Condominium owners who cannot afford such large reserve requirements in order to prevent large numbers of foreclosures and condominium terminations that could result if these laws are left as is.

Florida Legislature

Florida Senate bill 4-D Approved in Special Legislative Session

On May 26, 2022, the Governor of Florida signed into law Senate Bill 4-D in response to the Surfside hi-rise collapse in Miami.  In order to minimize the chances of similar residential building collapses in the future, the new law will require mandatory structural inspections, structural integrity reserve studies and removal of waiver of reserves for condominium or cooperative buildings by 12/31/24.

While some Associations are engaging engineers and architects now to meet the new law provisions, as the new requirements either need not be completed before, or commence after 12/31/24, many Associations are planning to wait until after the 2023 legislative session next spring to see how the new law may be tweaked by the legislature to make its provisions less onerous to implement for most Associations.

In this article we will look at the requirements for the mandatory milestone structural inspections.  Next month we will look at the details of the structural integrity reserve studies and removal of the ability for Association members to vote to waive reserve study reserves.

For condominium or cooperative buildings three (3) stories or more in height, by December 31st of the year in which the building reaches thirty (30) years old [twenty five (25) years old for buildings located within three (3) miles from the coastline], and every ten (10) years thereafter, a Milestone Structural Inspection must be performed by a licensed architect or engineer.

If the building’s certificate of occupancy was issued on or before July 1, 1992, the buildings initial Milestone Structural Inspection must be performed before 12/31/24.

A local enforcement agency (City or County) must provide written notice of the required Milestone Inspection to the Association and the Association then has 180 days to complete Phase One of the Milestone Inspection.

Phase One of the Milestone Inspection requires the architect or engineer to perform a visual inspection of the building, including the major structural components, and provide a qualitative assessment of the structural conditions of the building.  If the architect or engineer finds no sign of substantial structural deterioration to any building components, then Phase Two of the inspection is not required and the professional doing the inspection then submits its inspection report to the local enforcement agency.

However, if substantial structural deterioration is found (substantial structural distress that negatively affects a building’s general structural condition and integrity and does not includes surface imperfections), then Phase Two of the Milestone Inspection must be performed.  This inspection may be as extensive or as limited as necessary to fully assess areas of structural distress in order to confirm that the building is structurally sound and safe for its intended use and to recommend a program for fully assessing and repairing distresses and damaged portions of the building.

Upon completion of the Phase One or Phase Two inspections, the inspection professional must submit a sealed copy of the inspection report, with a summary, findings, and recommendations for repairs, to the Association and the local building official with jurisdiction.  The Association is also required to distribute the summary to each unit owner and post a copy of the summary in a conspicuous place on the property.

Such repairs must be commenced within 365 days after receiving the Phase Two inspection report and the Association must provide the local enforcement agency with proof that repairs have been scheduled or commenced and if Association fails to provide such the local enforcement agency must review and determine if the building is unsafe for human occupancy.

The Association is responsible for all costs associated with the inspection.  If the officers or directors of an association wilfully and knowingly fail to have a Milestone Inspection performed, as required, such failure is deemed a breach of the officers’ and directors’ fiduciary duties to the owners.

Homeowners Associations

Who is going to button down before and clean up after the next hurricane?

We found out from Irma and Wilma that it is not a good idea to have loose items left outside a home or condominium unit and that the power can be out for many days after the hurricane passes.  The loose items can blow around damaging themselves and other property and food can rot quickly and appliances leak when the power is out for a prolonged period.

If your part time residents have departed for the year and have no one checking on their home, damage can greatly increase from the next storm.  In order to mitigate and minimize such damage, many Associations have now adopted or approved rules and regulations requiring owners to remove all items from their balconies or yards prior to a storm approaching or prior to the owner will be leaving for the summer for a long duration.

Some Associations will even require that the owner designate a “condo or home checker” who will periodically check on the unit over the summer to make sure there are no water leaks and to button down the unit or home before an approaching hurricane.  This could include moving anything not nailed down outside on the balcony or yard to the inside of the building, putting pool furniture in the pool, and deploying hurricane shutters.  The contact information for the checker should be provided to the Association and the checker could be a paid company or local friend or family member.

The checker could also be required to empty out the fridges and freezers before or after the power goes out to prevent rotting food smelling and leaking from the appliances and resulting mold growth from emanating throughout the home or condominium building.

When the storm is rapidly approaching and Southwest Florida is in the cone, there is usually not much time to button down everything.  Usually, there is only a skeleton crew of owners still in residence and limited management personnel (who have not evacuated).  Therefore, it is so important that there are condo checkers (additional resources) still around to do the best they can in securing everything.

If an Association has implemented such home checker and button up rules and an owner fails to secure the home before they leave or engage a checker to do so while they are gone, some association’s rules will charge the owner for damage resulting from their negligent act of not preparing their home for the storm or not cleaning out their appliances after the power goes out.

Another important matter to consider is engaging a landscape or tree trimming company before the storm to be on a priority list to be onsite right after the storm to clear debris and tree limbs expeditiously from the property.  This could be especially important for folks who are around full time and may have mobility issues making it difficult to come and go.  Another priority list that may be good to get on is an inspection and emergency repair list from a superior local roofer.

To alleviate the power outages, there has been a lot of interest in obtaining generators for the condo building or for single family homes.  Sometimes an installed permanent building generator can power the entire building or just the elevators and common area lighting.  We have been hearing of some condo unit owners wanting to use portable gas generators on their balconies.  This would most likely be prohibited as a violation of local fire codes the same as propane grills are not allowed to be used, nor propane tanks stored, less than 10 feet from the multi-family building. An Association should always check with their local fire department prior to allowing any portable generators in or around the buildings.

Condominium Associations

When do Condominium Associations need to get competitive bids?

The Snow Birds are returning North so now begins the time, when less residents are around, for many Condominium and Homeowners’ Associations to perform needed building repairs and/or do that exciting lobby, social room or clubhouse renovation.

When hiring contractors to perform the repairs or renovations, we are often asked whether the Association needs to obtain competitive bids or not. With today’s supply chain issues and contractor back-ups getting competitive bids sometimes is not as easy as it used to be.

First we should look at where hiring professionals “do not” require competitive bids. First, pursuant to Section 718.3026, Florida Statutes, small Condominium Associations with 10 or fewer units may opt out of having to get competitive bids if two-thirds of the unit owners vote to do so.  Second contracts with employees of the association, and contracts for the following professionals: attorneys, accountants, architects, community association managers, timeshare management firms, engineers and landscape architect services, do not require competitive bids.  Also, if products or services are needed because of an emergency, or if the business entity with which the Association wishes to engage is the only source of supply within the county service the Association, competitive bids are not needed.

In a Condominium, if a contract for the purchase, lease, or renting of materials or equipment, or for the provision of services, require payment by the association on behalf of any condominium operated by the association in the aggregate that exceeds 5 percent of the total annual budget of the Association, including reserves, the Association must obtain competitive bids for materials, equipment or services.

There is no requirement to accept the lowest bid and you only need to get at least two (2) bids; not three (3) as many believe.

In addition to the bidding issues, it is also important to know that any contract that is not to be fully performed within 1 year for the purchase, lease, or renting of materials or equipment and all contracts to provide services shall be “in writing”. Also, pursuant to Section 718.3025, Florida Statutes, a contract to provide maintenance or management services shall not be valid unless it: “(a) Specifies the services, obligations, and responsibilities of the party contracting to provide maintenance or management services to the unit owners. (b) Specifies those costs incurred in the performance of those services, obligations, or responsibilities which are to be reimbursed by the association to the party contracting to provide maintenance or management services. (c) Provides an indication of how often each service, obligation, or responsibility is to be performed, whether stated for each service, obligation, or responsibility or in categories thereof. (d) Specifies a minimum number of personnel to be employed by the party contracting to provide maintenance or management services for the purpose of providing service to the association. (e) Disclose any financial or ownership interest which the developer, f the developer is in control of the association, holds with regard to the party contracting to provide maintenance or management services. (f) Discloses any financial or ownership interest a board member or any party providing maintenance or management services to the association holds with the contracting party.”

Selling Real Estate

The Surfside Tower collapsed last year in Miami and the Surfside Bills collapsed in this year’s Florida Legislature

There were two Florida Senate bills and one House of Representative bill considered by the Florida Legislature in this year’s session to address the collapse of the Surfside Tower last year.  The intent of the proposed bills were to help prevent similar Condo Building collapses in the future.  The bills were withdrawn prior to legislative vote.

Although the legislation was not voted upon or approved, it is instructive to review the bills that were proposed as they could return again in the 2023 State Legislature and may be approved then.

It is important to note that there are nearly one million condominium units in Florida condominium buildings that are at least 20 years old and of these about 630,000 are at least 40 to 60 years old.

Senate Bill 1702 was to establish a mandatory structural inspection program for multi-family residential buildings in Florida. Residential buildings greater than 3 stories and larger than 3,500 square feet were to be required to have a “milestone inspection” once the building reaches 30 years in age and every 10 years thereafter. If the building is within 3 miles of the coastline the inspection would be required at 20 years and every 7 years thereafter. The inspection would be done by a licensed architect or engineer. There was a two phase inspection process including a visual inspection and a structural distress inspection of the visual inspection warranted a second phase. The inspection report would be submitted to the condo board and the local building official. The board would then have to distribute the report to all the unit owners. The report would be an official Association record and would have to be provided to prospective unit purchasers. Local enforcement agencies could prescribe timelines and penalties with respect to compliance with the milestone inspections.

House Bill 7069 was substituted for Senate Bill 1702 on March 10.  The Bill would have revised the list of official records, reserve accounts and mandate reserve studies.  It would have eliminated reserve pooling.  It would have created milestone inspections and inspection reports.  It revised the information that must be provided to potential buyers and information included in the prospectus offering circular.  House Bill 7069 was withdrawn prior to a vote on March 12.

Last, Senate Bill 7042 would have revised the types of records that constitute the official records of a condominium association, revised the requirements for association budgets by limiting pooling of reserves and waiver of reserves.  The list of required reserve items would have increased to all items included in the building turnover inspection report. It would have also required milestone inspections performed at specific times.  It would have required associations to provide for maintenance, repair, and replacement of association property and would have authorized boards to adopt a special assessment or borrow money for certain reasons without unit owner approval.  Senate Bill 7042 was withdrawn on March 12 also.

Apparently there was lots of push back from owners and Associations who did not want to see drastic increases in their quarterly or monthly assessments that would be necessitated if these bills were adopted.

It is not unusual for such bills not to make it to a vote the first year they are trotted out and the proposals are usually tweaked to remove the more onerous provisions and brought back again in the following year where they may go to vote and get approved.  So, we will have to see what tweaks will occur and what will be on the agenda for the 2023 legislature to address the structural decay issues that lead to the tragic Surfside Tower collapse to lessen the change of a repeat.

Condos and HOA's

In gated communities gate guards are usually not security guards

Some people who live in gated communities get a false sense of security that they are “safe” because they live behind the gates and there are “security guards” at the gate.  They probably don’t understand that their community is just providing gate guards to control access through the front gate but they do not guarantee any “security” is being provided.

If a resident gives the guard house the name of a friend to be allowed access and the friend is actually a thief and then enters and steals from a neighbor, the gate guard did nothing wrong in allowing the access to the thief that was requested by the resident.

It is important to remind residents in gated communities that the Association and the Gate Guard Company is there to check who is permitted by the residents to come and go and not to provide or promise “security”. Broken gates or fences should be repaired and residents should promptly be informed if and when crimes are reported to occur in the community.

Some may remember a few years back there was a rash of home invasions in local gated communities.  It was determined that some thief’s prefer gated communities because less people artearound and they can walk in through the golf courses from neighboring roads and enter through the rear of the homes.

It is interesting to look at a few cases over the years that have or have not found liability of a homeowners’ or condominium association when crimes were committed in gated communities by outsiders.

In the 1983 case of Admiral’s Port Condo v. Feldman, the Feldmans were mugged on the Northeast parking lot of the Condominium.  The Association had established security procedures involving ingress and egress to the buildings.  Prior to this incident, no crimes against persons had been reported on Admiral’s Port property.  The only evidence presented of violent crimes occurred a substantial distance away from the Condo.  The Court found “no foreseeability” and no evidence the Association breached any duty owed to the Feldmans with respect to the security measures that it did employ.

Conversely, in Vazquez v. Lago Grande HOA decided in 2004, the gate guards were specifically warned by the owner not to let the ex-husband of the owner’s guest in because of his potential dangerousness.  The ex-husband then walked into the community past the security guards on duty and shot and killed the ex-wife.  In this case the Developer advertised the complex on the basis of security and collected assessments for safety provisions offered by the complex. The President of the HOA verified that they were there to protect the safety of the residents and guests and they had the right expect the complex would be safe “as promised”.  The Board gave guard gate post orders how to screen people for entry but there were numerous complaints made to the Association that visitors were not being logged in and were entering the complex without authorization- especially on foot.  The Plaintiffs were awarded 4 million.  The Court held that once the Association undertook obligations of providing security, it had to do so.

Last, in the 2015 case of Sanders v. ERP Operating Limited Partnership, the Sanders were shot to death inside their apartment that was marketed as a Gated Community. Three years prior to the murders, the gate was broken resulting in an armed robbery and assault. The gate was broken two months prior to the murders and twenty criminal incidents occurred within a three year period and none were reported to the residents. The jury awarded $4.5 million. The Court ruled that the jury need to decide whether the inoperable gate was a proximate cause of the deaths. Even if a victim voluntarily opened a door for the assailants that did not negate the apartment complex’s breach of duty by allowing the inoperable gate which was intended to limit access to only those authorized.

Homeowners Associations

Are your governing documents nuisance provisions strong enough?

Many older, or Developer drafted, community governing documents have weak or lack any nuisance provisions.  This prevents many Condominium and Homeowners’ Associations from being able to legally go after obnoxious residents for their bad behavior.

 We are seeing many more people escaping from lock downs up north this Season to enjoy our Florida sunshine and Florida freedom. Many of these coming are not owners of condominium units or homes here but are rather renters or guests of owners.

Many of these short term visitors do not have the same respect for their neighbors and the property that most owners do as they are not invested in the community.  As a result, some display bad behavior such as yelling and cursing at other residents, playing music loudly, or leaving personal property such as beach chairs or bikes all over the common areas.

Without good nuisance language in your Declaration of Condominium or Declaration of Covenants, it can be difficult or not impossible to legally get these offenders in line.

Here is an example of what we consider good “enforceable” nuisance language:  No owner shall use his unit or the common elements or permit his unit or the common elements to be used, in any manner which constitutes or causes an unreasonable amount of annoyance or nuisance to the occupant of another unit, or which would not be consistent with the maintenance of the highest standards for a first class residential condominium, nor permit the premises to be used in a disorderly or unlawful way.  The use of each unit and the common elements shall be consistent with existing laws and the condominium documents, and occupants shall at all times conduct themselves in a peaceful and orderly manner.  No, owner, tenant or guest may disturb any other owner or resident with the use of profane, obscene, threatening or abusive comments either orally or in writing or by their conduct on the property that is abusive or threatening.

With this type language, an Association can send violation letters to the nuisance offender and if they don’t start acting civil and quit annoying other residents after notice, the Association can then bring legal action against them.  It can first request pre-suit mediation or arbitration and if that does not work, then sue the offender in local court requesting the court order an injunction against the offender requiring them to quit being a nuisance in the community. The Association can also request that the court award prevailing party attorney’s fees to it.  That means if the Association prevails, the offender may have to pay the Association’s attorney’s fees in addition to any of his or hers own attorney’s fees.

If the offender continues to create a nuisance or starts new nuisances after the injunction order, then the court could find the person in contempt of court.  In that case, the court would usually order the offender to pay a fine.  If that does not stop the violations, the court could ultimately send the offender to jail as a penalty.

  The bad acting visitors need to understand that such bad behavior will not be tolerated in your community.  Sometimes an example needs to be made to prevent such behavior in other visitors from happening.  The bad actors behavior can get very costly for them.

You should check you governing documents sometime to make sure you have nuisance provisions that can be enforced.  If not, you should seriously consider amending the documents so that you can stop bad resident behaviors.  Otherwise, these types may yell freedom of speech, thumb their nose at you, and continue to wreak havoc around your community.

Condominium Associations

Grandfathering of Rental Restrictions in Condos and HOA’s

For many years now, Chapter 718, Florida Statutes has provided that any new rental restrictions approved by the membership of a Condominium as an amendment to the governing documents only apply to those who voted for the amendment or those who obtained title to the unit after the amendment was approved and recorded in the County Public Records.

 Section 718.110(14), Florida Statutes, applicable to Condominiums, provides that:  “An amendment prohibiting unit owners from renting their units or altering the duration of the rental period applies only to unit owners who consent to the amendment and unit owners who acquire title to their units after the effective date of the amendment.”

 There was nothing similar in the law governing Home Owners Associations’ (HOA’s) when they amended their governing documents to change permissible lease period durations and number of leases per year.  If, the membership properly approved such more restrictive amendments, they applied to all home owners.

This changed effective July 1, 2021 when the Florida Legislature passed Senate Bill 630. Now, for all amendments to HOA’s governing documents enacted after July 1, 2021, more restrictive rental regulations approved by the members will also, like Condos, only apply to a parcel owner who acquires title to the parcel after the effective date of the amendment or to a parcel owner who consented to, or voted to approve, the more restrictive rental regulation.

  However, there are exceptions to this new regulation in HOA’s.  If the amendment is to prohibit or regulate rental agreements for a term of less than six (6) months and/or prohibits the rental of a parcel for more than three (3) times in a calendar year, then the amendments will apply to all parcel owners.

So, in HOA’s, approved short term rental restrictions of less than six (6) months and limiting of rentals to no more than three (3) times a year will apply to all owners wherein rental restrictions of six (6) months or more or limits of three (3) times, two (2) times or one (1) time a year are applicable to owners who voted to approve the amendments and those who acquire title to the parcel after the effective date of the amendment.

  The intent of this new provision in HOA’s appears to be to disfavor short term leases less than six (6) months as well as disfavor multiple leases of four (4) or more times per year while still allowing grandfathering of current owners who want to lease at least six (6) months or shorter periods up to three (3) times a year while at the same time acknowledging that some owners purchased their homes with collection of rental income in mind.

Sales taxes come into play with rentals at six (6) months and if a parcel is advertised for sale for more than three (3) times a year for less than thirty (30) days, the State of Florida could consider the unit a “hotel/motel” which could then have to retrofit the parcel with the same fire and life safety and handicap equipment the same as a hotel/motel in Florida.